lifejogger 6,650 Posted October 20 Share Posted October 20 Shots around Darrington , MSFS and Prpr3d v5. Kind of hard to compare. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
olderndirt 8,056 Posted October 20 Share Posted October 20 Don't have either one but I'd venture the two with the 170 are P3D. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dario 3,510 Posted October 20 Share Posted October 20 (edited) In these shots, #2 and #4 (P3D) are looking better, IMHO. Edited October 20 by Dario Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lifejogger 6,650 Posted October 20 Author Share Posted October 20 31 minutes ago, Dario said: In these shots, #2 and #4 (P3D) are looking better, IMHO. I also think the P3d v5 shots look better than m=MSFS 2020 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradB 22,053 Posted October 20 Share Posted October 20 Bring in live WX or the new WPP program and that's when the new Sim really start's to shine IMHO . 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lifejogger 6,650 Posted October 20 Author Share Posted October 20 1 hour ago, BradB said: Bring in live WX or the new WPP program and that's when the new Sim really start's to shine IMHO . What is WPP program? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wakashi 4,915 Posted October 20 Share Posted October 20 I don't have MS yet either but looks to me as if your P3D is out doing your MSFS a bit! Are your MSFS settings as high as your rig can stand? I see different settings in several other posts is why I ask, and as John says maybe the weather programs will boost it a bit! All four pics are rock em, sock em though! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lifejogger 6,650 Posted October 21 Author Share Posted October 21 31 minutes ago, Wakashi said: I don't have MS yet either but looks to me as if your P3D is out doing your MSFS a bit! Are your MSFS settings as high as your rig can stand? I see different settings in several other posts is why I ask, and as John says maybe the weather programs will boost it a bit! All four pics are rock em, sock em though! I will check and see what my settings are and if I need to I will increase them. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradB 22,053 Posted October 21 Share Posted October 21 1 hour ago, lifejogger said: What is WPP program? https://orbxdirect.com/partner/sofly 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
adambar 15,157 Posted October 21 Share Posted October 21 Nice ones John, but like Roger said, something just doesn't look right around the Darrington area, mine looks completely different. MSFS is so good and life like, I removed all the other Sims from my computer, I don't even care about all the aircraft and scenery I had for P3D. flying around the area I live, everything is as it should be including my house. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradB 22,053 Posted October 21 Share Posted October 21 John I use these settings for my MS2020 in this video : John 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
z06z33 193 Posted October 21 Share Posted October 21 We need TrueEarth in MSFS Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jean marc 2,803 Posted October 23 Share Posted October 23 the great visual aspect in mfsf is fantastic a lowest altitude : here is a shot - really immersive IMHO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DunRingill 68 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 Great shots! Regarding pic #3: at some locations MSFS displays landclass scenery using very ugly textures. This happens when there's clouds or other anomalies (spelling?) in the satellite textures. And sometimes for no apparent reason at all. I think that is what's happening with Darrington in pic #3. /Magnus Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wolfko 822 Posted October 28 Share Posted October 28 @lifejogger First od all this is a set of geet pics. Your comparison is not fair, because you are not comparing MSFS with P3d but MSFS with TE. But still for me the MSFS shot look much better, bacause of atmosphere and lighting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stiletto2 197 Posted October 29 Share Posted October 29 (edited) I have attached two images using MSFS and Orbx 1S2 with most graphic settings set to High though Terrain Detail is set at about 150 since I don't see any real frame rate hit. The first image is taken from the same perspective as John's pic #3. The second image is taken just above street level in the town of Darrington. For me, these two pics attest to the superior visuals found in MSFS. The only downside is that the mountain topography elevations are smoother than P3DV5 due to Microsoft's current SDK block to 3rd party developers (including Orbx) on uploading higher rez meshes. Hopefully, Microsoft will lift that soon. Edit: I have added a P3Dv5HF2 pic just above street level at the same point as the MSFS pic for comparison. The P3Dv5 pic does not have shadows turned on since they slow down my frame rates too much. Even ignoring the shadows, it is amazing how much more real the MSFS pic looks due to MSFS 's fantastic lighting. MSFS: P3Dv5: Rod Edited October 29 by stiletto2 Added pic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.