Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'fps'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Announcements
    • Orbx Release Announcements
    • Orbx Preview Announcements, Screenshots and Videos
    • Orbx Company Updates
    • Partner Previews and Announcements
  • Public
    • Orbx Product Reviews
    • General Discussion - NO SUPPORT REQUESTS HERE PLEASE
    • Community Screenshots
    • Community Videos
    • Hardware and Tech Talk
  • Support Forums
    • Microsoft Flight Simulator Support Forum
    • PREPAR3D® V5.x Support Forum
    • PREPAR3D® V4.x Support Forum
    • PREPAR3D® V3.x Support Forum
    • FSX Support Forum
    • FSX Steam Edition Support Forum
    • X-Plane 11 Support Forum
    • IPACS Aerofly FS 2 Support Forum
    • Orbx Central Support Forum
    • Orbx Global Vector Support
    • Orbx Global openLC Support
    • Orbx Freeware Support Forum
  • Partners
    • Orbx Partners Support

Calendars

  • Community Calendar
  • Flight Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location:


Interests:


Transaction ID


Facebook Profile

Found 19 results

  1. Just an FYI. I had an issues with FPS and AA after installing LFLL using Orbx Central. I edited the scenerey_packs.ini and moved the "Lyon_Roads" below the main Lyon entry and the frame rate was back to being smooth and the AA issues that I was experiencing disappeared. Anyone experiencing the same issue should change their scenery_packs.ini and see if it makes a difference. Change: SCENERY_PACK Custom Scenery/Digital_Design_A_LFLL_Lyon_Roads/ SCENERY_PACK Custom Scenery/Digital_Design_LFLL_Lyon/ to SCENERY_PACK Custom Scenery
  2. Hello everyone, To be honest I am pretty annoyed. I have done three windows reinstallations within the last 2 weeks. 2 days ago I was happy that I could finally have +35 fps, even in the FSLabs. Yesterday however I wanted to do another flight and when I dropped at a gate with the FSLabs, I suddenly got 28 fps. I know that you all will say: These are enough framerates, but that is not the thing. The problem begins when I pan the view. Either with a chaseplane preset or when I move my mouse even slightly to see the autopilot. I get such annoying stutters. And 2 days ago everything was fine.
  3. Hi It is a bit disappointing to have such reviews and as a result purchased Orbx Southern UK with Southampton Airport - loaded OK but on running XP11.5 OpenGl and Vulkan. I had been happily running at 35-40fps and now its dropped to 14!! For the life of me I cannot understand why... can you help please? I'm sure there is a fix simwhere... Cheers Nik
  4. I read so many nice comments about upgrading to Win 10 Pro v2004 and it's effect on P3D v4.5 that I did the upgrade. I am so disappointed and absolutely frustrated. When I loaded up P3Dv4.5 to test So far not so good. My FPS dropped down to 4.2 . I haven't been able to get them back up. It is impossible to fly at 4 FPS. My computer is not a slouch, check my signature. So I reverted back to v1909. The frame rates are still at 4.X. So then I tried reinstalling P3D v4.5. That didn't do any good either. Anyone else having this problem? I have reduced my graphics settings to default and even lo
  5. Hello Everyone. I'll cut to the chase. Had Idaho Falls for a while and never had any issue with it. Ever since updating to 4.4 (and now 4.5) I have been getting pretty bad frame rates at IDA. My usual FPS is 40-45 in VC and 60 outside (even at FlyTampa Vegas). At Idaho falls these values are 28-31 in vc and no more than 45 outside. It's not my rig (i7700k OC 4.9GHz Dual 1080 SLi 16 gb of ram, 500 gb ssd just for p3d). I have tried turning everything off in the ftx control panel but nothing. Even tried the stock f22 and frame rates are about the same. Thought it might have been envshade but upd
  6. Dear, I have a hardware related question. Hopefully someone can help me, since ORBX products are causing FPS decrease on my machine (especially True Earth NL). Recently I upgraded from a GTX1060 to a GTX1080 (used). I was expecting an increase on average FPS after reading several benchmarks and forums. Within the area of Amsterdam (use of Global, Vector, Open LC EU and True Earth NL) the average FPS is 12 with lower limit of 8 and upper limit of 15. I have done a lot of research into software changes and mods, so the chance of software related issues is min
  7. Hallo guys, can someone help me? Orbx demo product successfully installed and looks great with orbx weather in FSX SE, but in Reykjavik airport I have only 14-17 fps drops 20-average, it's not playable. I read the manual and made recommended settings, but it didn't help me. Where I can find system requirements for orbx products or how I can optimize that? Without orbx I have stable playlable fps My specs: i5 6600k 3.5Ghz,quad core gtx 970 4gb 8gb RAM HDD WD Blue 500gb windows 10 pro
  8. Hello, Steward Airport is on my top list of favorite airports from FTX but it has animated vegetations and airport's grass (3D, many). With many addons (airplanes) fps are good and acceptable but with more complex addons I noticed fps drop (some fps takes airport, some addon). Im sure (I use high SSAA) this impact has grass. In options, not many settings for this (like in many FTX addons): Any idea how to temporarily increase fps at scenery of CZST? For example removing grass (OFF)? Thanks for ideas!
  9. Hello, I found out that whenever i switch my antialiasing settings from 4xSSAA to 2xMSAA my FPS at ESSA double. I tested this at various other Aiports (FT KBOS, AS EGLL, FB KDEN, ect.) and the FPS remaind unchanged. Is there a reason why antialiasing affects Stockholm so much? Kind regards Sami
  10. Hi, I haven't yet GE.N but I read on Avsim posts about poor performace (FPS and stutter) of this Region compared to other big regions of FTX. Is it true? What are your impressions ...
  11. Hi, First of all I would like to ask for an apology if this question has been asked or answered before. I have a rig I bought in 2013 with an Intel Core i5 - 3350P CPU @ 3.10 GHZ. My graphics card is an AMD Raedeon HD7770. I am running P3Dv4 (no previous versions) and FTX Global, Open LC Europe and EU-England. Apart from that it's all default. When I ran on all default (without ORBX) I got an average of 55FPS but when I installed ORBX I got 25FPS average. Does anyone have any idea why? I have read hear and there that ORBX products are a little b
  12. With a new one on the horizon what annoys you about current flight sims? For me it's autogen popup, I have tweaked my CFG till the cows come home and it's as smooth as can be but I cannot stand watching trees and buildings pop up it kills the . I don't suffer from ooms or ctds freezeups etc.
  13. FTX Norway, Airport ENVA default. At the apron terminal B and on taxiway Y near gate A4 the fps drops from 30/40 to 8/12 (setting unlimited). Is not a big issue, but is curious to me. P3Dv3.1, MJC8Q400, ASN, GSX. Kind regards and nice 2016 to all.
  14. As I have purchased almost every ORBX scenery you can see that I'm a very satisfied customer. But now I'm facing a severe problem with NCA: I installed the freshly bought NCA scenery, the NCA airports (as far as available for P3Dv3) and actual libraries, switched FTX Central to North America and fired up P3Dv3. I set the plane to KSFO (Default, not Add on) and the FPS, limited in P3D to 20, immediately dropped to 7-8. Trying to take off became a kind of slideshow with drops to 3-4 FPS. Being airborne the frames altered between 7 and12. I also got lots of 1-3 seconds long stutters every
  15. Now I haven't had a chance to try this myself and I'm always sceptical of 'wild' claims like this but it seems some people have seen improvements in their sims by trying this tweak: http://steamcommunity.com/app/314160/discussions/1/618463738394364121/ I may try it myself later but if anyone else has any luck (or not) with this please share, Simon
  16. Hello Everyone, I am having a biggie here. In Australia my airports are not behaving well. Mostly the runways and ground texture in ORBX Melbourne and Brisbane for example are very blurry. Biggest issue is Sydney airport is non existent its all over the place some building are there some are not surroundings are a big blur nothing more. Installed Sydney X and it does not even show. Just installed FTX Lilydale and it does not work at all its not there. All this seems to have gone pear shaped after installing AU SP4 FTX but cannot be sure. I have installed global base, the whole of Australi
  17. Brought my new Wiz bang PC home at noon yesterday (see sig for specs). Had it connected in one hour. By 11 pm I had most of my support app files installed. Used Win7 "Ease Transfer" to port across most config. The biggest win here is that all the FSX log files were over and jumping to 1:00pm today when I ran the vanilla FSX for the first time, I saw all its old files and therefore my pilot records were there with logs back to when I first installed FSX in 2008 (900+ hrs and 1900+ landings). Very happy Jan!. Now came even more excitement, with all the scenery sliders maxed other than Autoge
  18. Hello. First off, absolutely love FTXG. I think it crushes GEX which I was using. That being said, I have a question regarding FPS with this product. I have done a COMPLETE reinstall of FSX because it got tweaked to death on my previous install. I run a lot of addons such as UT2, FS GLOBAL, REX Essentials with Overdrive, PMDG 737NGX, FS2Crew and airports and city payware addons. Now, after a clean install I decided I would build an FPS matrix to check my base line and then as I add an addon go test out the FPS performance. Everything right now in these tests are run wid
  19. Dear All, dealing with performance issues I started to ask myself: Is it useful to have a resolution of something like 1900 x 1080 on a 26‘‘ monitor? I turned down the resolution and my impression was that it does not narrow the view if you do so. I agree that if you run a beamer or a 40’’ (or bigger) screen it might be useful to have such high resolutions. But is it useful for smaller screens? And how will a lower resolution influence the performance (fps) of the computer? Is there a linear increase of frames? Maybe someone can comment on that. What resolutions do you guys run?
×
×
  • Create New...