Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

66 Excellent

About yanlaoge

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Profile Information

  • Gender:

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Original post from Avsim: "Apparently John Venema of Orbx is currently listed as a 3rd Party dev and is assigned to a 3rd Party Developers Group with a few others on MSFS forum. He also has access to Tech Alpha 1. Quite interesting as they havent made any official announcement yet." https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/568138-john-venema-listed-as-3rd-party-dev/
  2. At first I thought the new MSFS will make 3rd party developers live harder. As more informations are revealed, I see more possibilities. 1. Airports. This is very obvious and it has been discussed a lot. This is where orbx truly shines. 2. Regional sceneries. As beautiful as US and some parts of Europe may look, a greater part of the world is cursed with terrible satellite imagery. In fact, the prettier US and EU look, the uglier the rest parts of the world will be, and the greater the demand of 3rd party DLC for enhancement will arise. I am imagining enhancement in many directions that crys for 3rd party developers. A next generation of vector and openlc for the new MSFS? 3. Trees. The photogrammetry trees may look pretty from 10000 feet, but it will be quite messy within 3000 feet, and definitely an eyesore under 1000 feet. AI can do the conversion and improve the look, but it will still leave a lot of errors, which has already been shown from the preview. This is also the strong area of orbx. Orbx might lost some need for previous products, but new need will arise. Considering the new MSFS will greatly boost the user base of flight simulation, the gain will be more than the loss, if orbx can adapt properly.
  3. With hysteria and orgy going everywhere, it must be a difficult time for the whole flight sim industry which is completely taken by great great great surprise.
  4. They use photogrammetry which looks incredible from high above, but when getting lower we need better models, which leaves a lot of rooms for 3rd party developers as orbx.
  5. Yes yes yes! You pulled my heart strings...
  6. Orbx has not paid due respect to Sydney from the very beginning. It's about time to rectify this. Oh please!
  7. It’s a pity. I mainly use Aerofly FS2. I have been praying Orbx to be its savior, as I agree with all the above analysis of its difficult situation. But I don’t care now, with obvious reason that has also been stated above. The storm is thundering, and the world is changing.
  8. It would please everybody if ORBX could give us two options to choose: HD version of max redolution and standard version with less resolution. I'd choose quality and I have no problem with installation size.
  9. Great news for VR simmers. VR is the future (and very much the present), and Aerofly FS2 is the only sim of choice to fully enjoy TrueEarth in VR.
  • Create New...