Jump to content

Urmel81

Members
  • Content Count

    196
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

221 Excellent

About Urmel81

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 02/23/1981

Profile Information

  • Gender:
    Male
  • Location:
    Berlin, Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

648 profile views
  1. Sorry Nick, I'm completely wrong. Your Forum is perfect. I am a cheeky customer who dared to make a suggestion because it is not easy for customers to find a solution quickly. Yes, a little bit sarcasm is included, sorry for that. Sometimes Company's should listen a litte bit more to customers if some things could be improved that customers can help more easy themselfes. Regards Have fun The other guy mentioned Flytampa: Flytampa: 27 Products - 28 Topics Orbx: around 150 - 200 Airports: 1 Topic I don't think that the Orbx way is in this case the correct way - there should be better solutions for an forum. Regards Have fun
  2. Hi Nick, maybe you should read my request! I asked if it is normal or not! That's an YES or NO question. Should be easy to answer, but it seems not to be possible. IT WAS NO COMPLAINT, IT WAS AN NORMAL QUESTION. Yes, it's normal (and I'm fine with it) No, there is an fault (then we need to find the fault) I don't understand what's your problem is with this question. I have ticked FSX Ground Poly (Aprons, Taxiways, Runways) I said Apron is ok (Groundpoly visible) I said Runway is ok (Groundpoly partly visible - Parts should be wrong) I said I have Phototexture for Taxiways. (Groundpoly NOT visible - only the Phototexture - that should be wrong) May question was: IS IT NORMAL? Yes or no? APRON Picture: Taxiway: Runway: Maybe I'll get now the correct answer? Is it normal - YES or NO? Thanks for understanding. An request like this should be answered in the first time, because it should be easy for you experts to find out if the users is seeing the correct textures.
  3. Hi guys, after many really nice years with Orbx it is becoming really difficult for me (and I'm sure for others too) to get support from you guys. You have so many airports and other great products where we users need sometimes support. Normally I go to the forum for that product and check if there is any solution. But this isn't really possible with Orbx. When I need support for an airport I need an really long time (search engine, clicking through the sides, ...) to find anything. Mostly an new topic needs to be created because the search was not successful. For all of your (maybe 150 - 200 airports) we have at the moment only one topic (at the moment Prepar3d v4 topic) to find something. For us useres it will be much better to have splittet topics (maybe not for every airport one, but maybe vor continents, Airport sice - GA - Regional - Hub, ....or something else). This will make it for me (and for others) much more easy to find posts for our problems (mostly they have been asked before). The some thing for your other Products, the different openLC, FTX, ... You should consider splitting your forum. It's much more easy for us useres. And you will have less work to, because we can find our solutions by reading and we don't need to ask always. Example: For my last question I never get really support: I had ticked FSX-Groundpoly for YBBN (Runways, Apron and Taxiways), but got only one for the Runways and the Apron. The taxiways still appear as an phototexture. Nobody could answer my question if this is normal or not. Normaly I look to the already created topics and find it out myself hopefully ... when not, I can ask. Thanks Urmel
  4. Thanks, I have fsx ground poly but still only photoreal textures. no idea why?
  5. You have also fsx groundpoly ticked in the manager? Thanks
  6. Anyone an screenshot to compare if the scenery is working correct in my sim? Thanks a lot
  7. Not sure, if you look to the screenshot you see only phototexture un the taxiways. Is this normal? Groundpoly is ticked and a groundpoly should be visible for the taxiways. Apron is working.
  8. Sorry, yes YBBN. So it is not completely working in P3Dv4?
  9. Hello, is this normal when Ground Poly is ticked in the Configuration Manager? Aiport YMML It says, Taxiways and Aprons have an Groundpoly. Aprons are ok, taxiways not. from the Manager: This uses a FSX Ground Poly to cover the entire runways, taxiways and aprons. Regards
  10. Hello, I spotted this small failure on approach to Cape Town. Thanks for this fantastic product, I was waiting years for it - and finally it arrived- Great Work. Consider Asia again Thanks Urmel
  11. No real idea at the moment. have you tried to disable gsx and enable it again? Next step should be removing esgg_gsx.ini, disable gsx, enable gsx and try with default gsx. After this you can bring the esgg_gsx.ini back to the scenery folder. I never had this message. keep us updated. Regards Urmel
  12. Together with the NAVDATA there is no "SALEN" callsign for this airport included in the default P3D. An member from the famous AIG AI Traffic Team created one for it. You'll find it here: https://jcai.dk/2020/03/salen-scandinavian-mountains-airport-esks/ Regards Urmel
  13. Try this: https://jcai.dk/2019/12/Orbx-lybe-belgrade-nikola-tesla-airport/ Regards Urmel
  14. Who is the developer of this airport scenery? Normally it's published, but I can't find it. Thanks
  15. The topic is marked as resolved? Is there an update with an fix I missed?
×
×
  • Create New...