Jump to content

W2DR

Members
  • Content Count

    590
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

327 Excellent

About W2DR

  • Rank
    Life Member

Profile Information

  • Gender:
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

816 profile views
  1. I agree. But we're not talking about FSX vs. FS9. Do you have a PPL (I do )? If not, what is the basis for your comment?
  2. Sure, I've seen the video. But the vast majority of the folks who will buy MSFS2020 are doing it for the eye-candy not the aerodynamics. I haven't seen one single post that said "wow, I can't wait to experience the latest in aerodynamics". But there are thousands of posts talking about the scenery.
  3. There was a time when MSFS was all about flight dynamics and procedures. FSX changed all that. Now it's just an eye-candy simulator. And FS2020 will just make it worse. Why isn't there a car in my driveway?................
  4. I won't buy it unless it includes the dark side. Landing in the sunlight is no challenge at all................
  5. I wonder how many of us remember those days..............
  6. I think Orbx tends to forgive/ignore this for a home-user but, from the EULA: 1.2 You may install, access, and run a single copy of the Software Product on a single personal computer for your personal, non-commercial, non-profit use. Note the word "single". I just thought you should be aware of it just in case................
  7. I agree with John. I'd stay with the 9600K. The single-core max turbo is 4.6HGhz and I doubt if the increase in FPS with a 9900K is worth the investment.....Doug
  8. And all this time I thought we were talking about a FLIGHT sim.......................
  9. Also: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=16TLldaoxxmFv7wOWfYyM8zV-bgM&hl=en_US&ll=40.07402637900601%2C-121.63884731506948&z=8
×
×
  • Create New...