Jump to content

aussieh

Members
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About aussieh

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender:
    Male
  • Location:
    Sydney, Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Cheers @XCLTM3 - I knew there was a thread regarding it but in my haste before work this morning I couldn't find it. Thanks very much!
  2. Hi All, On a flight yesterday I noticed some odd black textures (see spoiler below). Not sure if the snow should be there or not (whilst winter, it wasn't that cold yesterday!) but the black textures certainly look out of place. Is it an installation issue or a file issue? Location: S33° 54.78' E149° 57.00' Cheers!
  3. No problems at all. Learning a complex aircraft is a steep learning curve for everyone (professional pilot's are not excluded from that). In my experience, the saying "you get out what you put in" has always rung true. If you're prepared to put in the work and really think about - you'll find it very interesting. You'd probably also be surprised how much of your GA experience still carries up to flying a commercial jetliner. Despite having a few extra systems and such the wings and primary controls still work the same as a light aircraft! A lot of those acronyms and such you learn in initial flight training always stick with you - if they aren't embedded in checklists (perhaps under different names but still the same concept) then you quite often find yourself still doing it in your head! Enjoy!
  4. Hi Anthony, Others may have better input regarding parking, however I can probably assist with the departures. Following on from Mike's comments regarding vectoring - it's even simpler than that. Generally speaking the only people who vector are approach controllers. So mostly, departures from smaller airports are almost entirely under pilot navigation. I know Coffs Harbour operates under what's called "procedural separation." Tamworth may be different as it's a joint civil-military field and I believe ATC is provided by the military. Smaller procedural towers don't usually operate on SIDs. SIDs are designed to enhance busy airspace by keeping all aircraft on known routes, clear of other routes (inbound/outbound) and keep clear of obstacles. This is not normally an issue in Class D airspace, like that that surrounds Coffs Harbour. Further, procedural towers don't use primary radar feeds for separation, instead utilising VOR radials (where applicable), distance and altitude for separation. Most procedural airspace that has SIDs (that I'm aware of), the instructions are usually just climb to 800' then turn left (or right) to intercept the XXX radial outbound or a GNSS route. Most radials would normally match up with a published route anyway. Airliners tend to also use company departure procedures that are a combination of a "pseudo-SID" and an engine out escape procedure. These are created by the airlines (or by providers such as Jeppesen on behalf of airlines). Big bucks are spent on these to establish obstacle data and surveys and therefore closely guarded documents. In the absence of SIDs, ATC take-off instruction is usually along the lines of "Velocity 1166 cleared for take-off, make left (or right) turn." This also implies approval to track in accordance with the route clearance obtained prior to taxi. Usually, this would be what's planned. Sometimes however it may require initially tracking outbound on a different radial to ensure separation with other traffic. In the latter case the turn after take-off would then be to intercept the cleared radial. Once clear of traffic, the tower or Centre (depending on the point at which separation is assured) would then normally just clear you from present position direct to a waypoint in your flightplan rather than vectoring. Having said all that, based on FlightRadar24 data it would seem that for Coffs at least, the 737's and A320's heading south (Sydney/Melbourne) make a right turn off 03 (standard circuit direction off 03 at Coffs) at around 1,500'. This follows a sweeping right climbing turn to intercept outbound track. For 21, heading South, they make a right hand turn. Legally, this can't be made until 500' above circuit (which would be 1600' for a high performance aircraft, so not below 2,100') or outside 3nm (which is considered the outer boundary of the circuit). Essentially, what you're aiming to do is remain clear of obstacles or terrain. I'm not sure what your experience level is but if you look at an approach plate for an airport there is either a circle with different numbers and possibly sectors marked out (older Navigraph/Jeppesen and ASA) or in the middle of the approach diagram, a brown circle with numbers (newer Navigraph/Jeppesen only). These are your Minimum Safe Altitudes (MSA's). Above these heights you can be sure you won't run into anything fixed (i.e. other aircraft notwithstanding). The inner ring is 10nm and the outer is 25nm. You can see with the Coffs Harbour one, they are broken up into smaller sectors, likely due to terrain, obstacles or both. In the Western half, the 10nm MSA is 5,000' however on the Eastern side, as long as you are within that specific sector, it comes down to 2,500'. In a light aircraft going from sea level to 2,500' climbing at around 500-700 feet per minute, will take many miles and around 3-5 minutes. For a high performance jet climbing at 3,000-4,000 feet per minute it will take less than a minute and probably only 1-2 miles. Making a turn in an Easterly direction at 1,500' you only need to climb another 1,000' to enter the 2,500' MSA and be protected by that. Climbing at 150kts and 4,000 feet per minute will take approximately 0.5nm and 15secs. If you've loaded the route into the FMS then you should already have the route CFS-BANDA (track 213°). Once you've completed the turn, it's as simple as intercepting that route. Normal IFR intercepts are considered to be 30° (45° if required). So if you made a right hand turn off runway 03 - you'd be aiming for a heading of between 243-258° to intercept. Once established on the intercept heading you can safely push the LNAV button and the autopilot will complete the intercept and join the flight planned route. At the end of the day, what you're aiming for is getting from an environment that's filled with threats (terrain, other aircraft, obstacles, etc.) to one where you can limit the threats as much as possible. Other aircraft can really be removed, so what's the only way to remove the risk of obstacles/terrain? Get to an altitude above them. A light aircraft may not be able to fly a SID as the required climb rate may exceed the available performance. So what would you do in that circumstance, or if departing from a small field that has no SID? Initial IFR training teaches you to climb above the airport where you know it's safe until you're at an altitude that's going to keep you clear. That may mean lingering in the area for a few minutes longer, but that's the safest option. In a high performance aircraft you can utilise that additional performance to fly a bit more efficiently. It's almost a mental checklist before you maneouvre to the outbound track: Am I at a safe altitude? If I turn now can I be sure I'll be clear of all terrain or obstacles? If I suffer an engine failure will I still be safe (airliners are required to be able to climb on one engine as part of the certification requirements)? Am I clear of all traffic? Have I met all my legal and ATC requirements? If the answer is "yes" to all the above, then it's safe to turn. Hope that clears things up a bit for you. Cheers, Haydn
  5. Hi Jim, Directly from the SODE website (https://sode.12bpilot.ch/?page_id=2): Essentially it is a control system for various animations. For most sim users jetway control is the primary use however it can do other things as well (I believe I've seen some developers use it for a pseudo pilot-activated lighting system). I don't own a great deal of airports that have it but it seems as though the jetway animation is a little smoother and "connects" to the aircraft in a slightly more natural way. The other major advantage is that you can have multiple jetways per parking gate therefore allowing connections to multiple doors as quite often happens on bigger aircraft to expedite the boarding process. You can also select which jetway connects to which door. As I understand, the creator is a working airline pilot and does it as a side hobby. I believe he has also developed a Visual Docking Guidance System (VDGS) plug-in for SODE it however is a commercial product and not free. Hope that answers the question. Haydn
  6. Groan definitely!!!!! But thanks for sharing Happy New Year to you too!
  7. Hi All, I recently upgraded from P3D v2 to v3 which of course involved re-installation of my Orbx scenery. This happily also coincided with the release of FTX Central v3 and the change to OrbxDirect. I reinstalled the freeware AI Traffic initially selected the "Add to Account" option via the website. FTX Central then happily downloaded and installed it for me. I then went to the control panel and de-selected the default AI traffic, selected the FTX traffic along with the FlyTampa YSSY enhanced APX file and the enhanced ATC sound file. On loading the simulator I discovered that the AI had installed correctly in terms of models however the enhanced ATC sound file was missing. Upon further research I determined you had to select this to be installed during the installation process (I had initially forgotten this as it had been a while since my last install of FTX AI Traffic). With the extremely streamlined download/install process within FTX Central v3 I did not receive an option to install these additional files (perhaps the process is just a tiny bit too efficient in this specific circumstance??). I reinstalled the files via a downloaded v5 installer I had from my FSX:SE install (pre Central v3) and that has rectified the issue, however I thought it was perhaps worth bringing to your attention. This is in no way a complaint at the very comprehensive and impressive AI traffic package! Out of curiosity I have been unable to determine exactly what the enhanced APX file does if anyone can shed some light on this? Also, as it's extremely new I'm not sure if you're aware that Tiger Australia has just changed callsigns to "Tig-Oz". I am aware that I can fix that myself but again thought it was worth bringing to your attention for a future update. Kind Regards, Haydn
  8. Worked perfectly thankyou! I remembered as I read your reply it was supposed to be folder rather than textures, but being new to Windows 7 I was unfamiliar with the bug for adding scenery.... thanks again!
  9. Ah ok. Thankyou very much for your help, I'll try that solution when I get home and let you know. Cheers.
  10. Thanks for the reply Ian. That's the part I'm getting stuck on. I go to the scenery library menu, click add area but then can't find the scenery files to add. I can see there are files in the Orbx file in the FSX main folder, however when I navigate to the Orbx folder in the scenery library add area option, the folders are there, but the texture files are not. Even though they can be found through windows explorer.
  11. Just installed YMLT and YPLC to try the FTX Scenery but am not having any luck in manually adding the scenery to the FSX scenery library. AU Traffic installed with no problems, and traffic can be seen at both airports, but no updated scenery. I have installed the Orbx Library 110614 which was mentioned in the YPLC installation file. But when I go to add area, neither airport can be found. I have searched in both the Add On scenery folder and the Orbx folder. Cheers in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...